Matrix Inversion Using Gauss-Jordan Method

Master the efficient Gauss-Jordan algorithm for inverting larger matrices

Introduction to Gauss-Jordan Elimination

The Gauss-Jordan method is a systematic approach for finding matrix inverses that works efficiently for matrices of any size. Unlike Cramer's method, which becomes impractical for larger matrices, Gauss-Jordan is the standard algorithm used in practice.

The key idea is to simultaneously transform a matrix into its inverse through a series of row operations on an augmented matrix.

Key Concept:

We place the original matrix \(A\) alongside the identity matrix \(I\), then apply row operations to transform \(A\) into \(I\). When \(A\) becomes \(I\), the right side becomes \(A^{-1}\).

When Does an Inverse Exist?

Necessary Conditions

Requirements for Invertibility:
  • Matrix must be square (\(n \times n\))
  • Matrix must be non-singular (determinant ≠ 0)
  • Matrix must have full rank (\(\text{rank} = n\))
Singular Matrices:

A singular matrix has a determinant of zero and cannot be inverted. If during Gauss-Jordan elimination you encounter a row of zeros on the left side, the matrix is singular.

The Gauss-Jordan Algorithm

High-Level Overview

Algorithm Steps
  1. Create augmented matrix: Write \([A \mid I]\)
  2. Apply row operations: Transform \(A\) to row echelon form
  3. Back substitution: Transform to reduced row echelon form
  4. Extract inverse: Right side becomes \(A^{-1}\)

Allowed Row Operations

The Gauss-Jordan method uses three fundamental row operations:

Row Swap
Exchange any two rows to get non-zero pivot elements
Row Scaling
Multiply a row by any non-zero scalar to simplify elements
Row Addition
Add a multiple of one row to another row to eliminate elements
Critical Rule:

All operations performed on the left side (matrix A) must also be performed on the right side (identity matrix I).

Transformation Process

\([A \mid I]\)
Row Operations
\([I \mid A^{-1}]\)

The goal: transform the left side from \(A\) to \(I\)

Complete Worked Example

Step-by-Step Gauss-Jordan Elimination

Find the Inverse of \(A = \begin{bmatrix}1 & 2 & 1 \\ 2 & 5 & -1 \\ 4 & 8 & 5\end{bmatrix}\)

Step 1: Create augmented matrix

\(\displaystyle \left[\begin{array}{ccc|ccc}1 & 2 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 2 & 5 & -1 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 4 & 8 & 5 & 0 & 0 & 1\end{array}\right]\)

Step 2: Eliminate below first pivot (R₂ - 2R₁, R₃ - 4R₁)

\(\displaystyle \left[\begin{array}{ccc|ccc}1 & 2 & 1 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & -3 & -2 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & -4 & 0 & 1\end{array}\right]\)

Step 3: Back substitution - eliminate above second pivot (R₁ - 2R₂)

\(\displaystyle \left[\begin{array}{ccc|ccc}1 & 0 & 7 & 5 & -2 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & -3 & -2 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & -4 & 0 & 1\end{array}\right]\)

Step 4: Eliminate above and below third pivot (R₁ - 7R₃, R₂ + 3R₃)

\(\displaystyle \left[\begin{array}{ccc|ccc}1 & 0 & 0 & 33 & -2 & -7 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & -14 & 1 & 3 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & -4 & 0 & 1\end{array}\right]\)

Result: The inverse is the right side

\(\displaystyle A^{-1} = \begin{bmatrix}33 & -2 & -7 \\ -14 & 1 & 3 \\ -4 & 0 & 1\end{bmatrix}\)

Cramer's Method vs Gauss-Jordan

Aspect Cramer's Method Gauss-Jordan Method
2×2 Matrices Very quick Reasonable
3×3 Matrices Manageable Efficient
4×4+ Matrices Very inefficient Standard method
Computational Steps O(n⁴) O(n³)
Practical Use Educational, 2×2 only Industry standard

Key Points to Remember

  • Create an augmented matrix \([A \mid I]\)
  • Apply row operations to transform \(A\) into \(I\)
  • Critical: Apply same operations to both sides
  • When left side becomes \(I\), right side becomes \(A^{-1}\)
  • The three row operations: swap, scale, add rows
  • If you get a row of zeros on the left, the matrix is singular
  • Works for any square matrix size
  • More efficient than Cramer's method for larger matrices
  • Industry standard algorithm for matrix inversion

Practice Your Skills

Test your understanding of matrix inversion with our interactive calculator:

Matrix Inverse Calculator →






Is this page helpful?            
Thank you for your feedback!

Sorry about that

How can we improve it?